Until, we as parents, take the responsibility of our childrens education and development back from these spawns of satan things like this will just continue snowballing. End all gov education NOW.
People should not force their morality on other people. A girl or boy is 12 or older should be allowed to read books and obtain other content which allows them to become full members of society.
You are one sick puppy! And IтАЩm not sure if you can grasp this In between your fantasies of 5 year olds. But, you did hear the part where a 4 year old boy goes down on a man? If this is your idea of age appropriate? You truly are a sick pedo! I hear the Little Rascals are onтАж grab you lube and hurry you can still catch it. The further Left the world slides the sicker it gets! Till you end up with sick fucks like Edwin! Who thinks 12 year olds become full members of society by learning about pedos! Keep your kids clear of Edwins!
Yeah, you're a pedo, so you can fuck right off. You're arguing for something that is both immoral and illegal.
Kids don't become "full members of society" by learning how to give other men blowjobs. That material is used to groom kids into non-consensual, pedophilic relationships and as the article points out, it's clearly violating the law. If the board had the law and morality on their side, they wouldn't have scurried away like the rats they are.
The point of the book in question is not normalize pedophilia among Girls and boys bit for Girls and boys to be aware of some things which occur in society. If Girls and boys are treated in an infantile manner, then they wouldn't know better.
Pornography isn't sex education. It's a supra-natural fantasy world that has proven, detrimental effects on the physical development of young people's brains and powerful addictive effects on both kids and adults (similar to that of cocaine). Various state & federal governments around the world ban or restrict porn to people under 18 because of this proven science. So spare me your ignorant argument about exposure and "knowing better." You, and the FPCS, obviously lack the intellect to know how to teach expose children to adult concepts in a responsible - or even a legal - way.
You want people to know better, then let them read about religion, civics, and history. This might shock you, but thousands of years of human civilization have been built without each new generation of kids needing to watch or read about perversions that pedos or pedo sympathizers like you want them to think is just a normal part of society.
Students in high school and middle schools should not subject to infantilization. Students in middle and high schools should be allowed to read controversial material, such as books containing sexual matter. Girls and boys who are 13 and older should not be treated as children who are 12 or younger. Those girls and boys already know about this stuff so supposedly protecting them from this subject matter is really a 'feel good policy' which treats them as less than who they are.
No one is arguing that high school students should be sheltered from all controversy, or kept in the dark about sexuality and sexual material. I remember reading a lot of John Irving for my AP English class in high school - 25 years ago - and he seems to have a penchant for writing about sexual acts between all kinds of unlikely companions (two kids, two or more homosexual / bisexual men or women, a woman and a horse, etc..).
Here are some very key differences between those experiences what you seem to be arguing - and how it differed from the materials highlighted by this courageous mother in Fairfax:
- I was 18, not 12.
- My school recognized the propsective controversy and made our parents sign off on our participation in the class, and it was transparent about the books and their content.
- There were no graphic illustrations, which stick with you far longer than simple text.
- There was no pedophilia.
- It wasn't pornography being illegally distributed to minors.
What you can't seem to understand is that prepubescent children as young as 12 have no sexual drive one way or the other - UNLESS they have been groomed or sexually abused by others, most commonly adults. It has nothing to do with treating children as less than they are, and everything to do with giving them a safe area in which to naturally grow and develop their own sexuality free of the corrupting, damaging influence of very sick people.
And let me remind you, these are OUR children - not the schools', not the school boards', not the states'. And WE have the ultimate say in what and how OUR children learn. It is OUR money that buys the materials to which OUR children are exposed, and it is OUR right, perogative, and mandate to do whatever is necessary to ensure that OUR kids are not being exploited by the tyrants who would rape them - mind, body, and soul. And like ANY parent, I will fight to the death to protect my children. That's a promise.
You're a predator. CHILDREN have no desire for sexual approval unless they're conditioned to. There's a special place in hell for trash such as yourself.
With that egregious perspective, you can ONLY be one of the following:
1. A full-fledged, practicing pedophile.
2. A pedophile aspirant attempting to justify the behavior in which you hunger to engage.
3. A mentally handicapped adult with a serious pathological issue.
4. A childless idiot who has bought the leftist narrative hook, line, and sinker.
5. A child yourself.
Unless you are the 5th option, you know how wrong you are given the context of the material within the article, but you simply refuse to acknowledge the truth that such activities and / or descriptions thereof have long lasting consequences for children who are exposed to it. You simply cannot win this argument with the "evidence" you (don't) have to support your position.
Ah, a FPCS board member, aka a pedophile, joins the chat.
Until, we as parents, take the responsibility of our childrens education and development back from these spawns of satan things like this will just continue snowballing. End all gov education NOW.
People should not force their morality on other people. A girl or boy is 12 or older should be allowed to read books and obtain other content which allows them to become full members of society.
You are one sick puppy! And IтАЩm not sure if you can grasp this In between your fantasies of 5 year olds. But, you did hear the part where a 4 year old boy goes down on a man? If this is your idea of age appropriate? You truly are a sick pedo! I hear the Little Rascals are onтАж grab you lube and hurry you can still catch it. The further Left the world slides the sicker it gets! Till you end up with sick fucks like Edwin! Who thinks 12 year olds become full members of society by learning about pedos! Keep your kids clear of Edwins!
Yeah, you're a pedo, so you can fuck right off. You're arguing for something that is both immoral and illegal.
Kids don't become "full members of society" by learning how to give other men blowjobs. That material is used to groom kids into non-consensual, pedophilic relationships and as the article points out, it's clearly violating the law. If the board had the law and morality on their side, they wouldn't have scurried away like the rats they are.
The point of the book in question is not normalize pedophilia among Girls and boys bit for Girls and boys to be aware of some things which occur in society. If Girls and boys are treated in an infantile manner, then they wouldn't know better.
Pornography isn't sex education. It's a supra-natural fantasy world that has proven, detrimental effects on the physical development of young people's brains and powerful addictive effects on both kids and adults (similar to that of cocaine). Various state & federal governments around the world ban or restrict porn to people under 18 because of this proven science. So spare me your ignorant argument about exposure and "knowing better." You, and the FPCS, obviously lack the intellect to know how to teach expose children to adult concepts in a responsible - or even a legal - way.
You want people to know better, then let them read about religion, civics, and history. This might shock you, but thousands of years of human civilization have been built without each new generation of kids needing to watch or read about perversions that pedos or pedo sympathizers like you want them to think is just a normal part of society.
Students in high school and middle schools should not subject to infantilization. Students in middle and high schools should be allowed to read controversial material, such as books containing sexual matter. Girls and boys who are 13 and older should not be treated as children who are 12 or younger. Those girls and boys already know about this stuff so supposedly protecting them from this subject matter is really a 'feel good policy' which treats them as less than who they are.
No one is arguing that high school students should be sheltered from all controversy, or kept in the dark about sexuality and sexual material. I remember reading a lot of John Irving for my AP English class in high school - 25 years ago - and he seems to have a penchant for writing about sexual acts between all kinds of unlikely companions (two kids, two or more homosexual / bisexual men or women, a woman and a horse, etc..).
Here are some very key differences between those experiences what you seem to be arguing - and how it differed from the materials highlighted by this courageous mother in Fairfax:
- I was 18, not 12.
- My school recognized the propsective controversy and made our parents sign off on our participation in the class, and it was transparent about the books and their content.
- There were no graphic illustrations, which stick with you far longer than simple text.
- There was no pedophilia.
- It wasn't pornography being illegally distributed to minors.
What you can't seem to understand is that prepubescent children as young as 12 have no sexual drive one way or the other - UNLESS they have been groomed or sexually abused by others, most commonly adults. It has nothing to do with treating children as less than they are, and everything to do with giving them a safe area in which to naturally grow and develop their own sexuality free of the corrupting, damaging influence of very sick people.
And let me remind you, these are OUR children - not the schools', not the school boards', not the states'. And WE have the ultimate say in what and how OUR children learn. It is OUR money that buys the materials to which OUR children are exposed, and it is OUR right, perogative, and mandate to do whatever is necessary to ensure that OUR kids are not being exploited by the tyrants who would rape them - mind, body, and soul. And like ANY parent, I will fight to the death to protect my children. That's a promise.
Edwin you do not deserve to breathe the same as we.
You're a predator. CHILDREN have no desire for sexual approval unless they're conditioned to. There's a special place in hell for trash such as yourself.
With that egregious perspective, you can ONLY be one of the following:
1. A full-fledged, practicing pedophile.
2. A pedophile aspirant attempting to justify the behavior in which you hunger to engage.
3. A mentally handicapped adult with a serious pathological issue.
4. A childless idiot who has bought the leftist narrative hook, line, and sinker.
5. A child yourself.
Unless you are the 5th option, you know how wrong you are given the context of the material within the article, but you simply refuse to acknowledge the truth that such activities and / or descriptions thereof have long lasting consequences for children who are exposed to it. You simply cannot win this argument with the "evidence" you (don't) have to support your position.